Great stuff, WW. As I understand it, a whole lot of plaster of paris has been used to "reconstruct" these giant creatures that fascinated so many Boomers, including me. Is there one verified dinosaur fossil that is all bone, and no plaster of paris? I have to admit they have helped make some great movies. So has Santa Claus. Thanks!
You should really try and get Agent131711 to make an appearance on "I Protest". His series has some excellent research, along the lines of "Masking the Truth". From Germs to the Big Bang, the "Halls of Science" have been feeding us bovine excrement for a long time. It's time to start connecting the proverbial dots.
If you just plug in "Agent131711" into Google or The Duck his substack link comes right up. On his substack "Dinosaurs are FAKE: The KRONOSAURUS & SHONISAURUS Water Dinos Edition - Part 3" is the first article on the list. The Link appears to be: https://substack.com/home/post/p-146222515
I don't have his contact info, and it is danged hard to get his attention. You cannot even post a comment to his free articles unless you are a paid subscriber.
Another question for you, WW, and this is more important to me: where do you go for sacraments? I’ve been leaning to the home alone position and it’s got me near despair.
I have not received any sacrament for three months now, although I have an independent priest whom I trust (just barely) coming to give me the sacraments for First Saturday, August 3rd. If you know of any priest who is not a pervert, is validly ordained, and offers the Traditional Mass, receive the sacraments from him. If you are in the state of mortal sin, go to even a Novus ordo priest for confession. (We may receive the sacraments of the dead-baptism and Confession- from doubtful priests.) Of course, if the priest is a notorious heretic- stay away absolutely.
People who go to the FSSP and SSPX must discern, based on local conditions. There may be some good priests in the SSPX, ignorant of the overall situation- though after the Fr Rostand affair, I am afraid if they are not investigating they are cowards and trying to hide from the truth.
In the meantime, Our Lady of Fatima foresaw these times, as did St Sr Lucia. In her epochal conversation with Fr Fuentes in December 1957, St Sr Lucia said: "Father, in these last times in which we are living, the Blessed Virgin has given a new efficacy to the praying of the Holy Rosary. This in such a way that there is no problem that cannot be resolved by praying the Rosary, no matter how difficult it is - be it temporal or above all spiritual - in the spiritual life of each of us or the lives of our families, be they our families in the world or Religious Communities, or even in the lives of peoples and nations. I repeat, there is no problem, as difficult as it may be, that we cannot resolve at this time by praying the Holy Rosary. With the Holy Rosary we will save ourselves, sanctify ourselves, console Our Lord and obtain the salvation of many souls."
As long as you are faithfully praying your rosary, take hope, gather strength, and push forward. Our Lady will NEVER abandon you. And you will see her graces in your life. Meanwhile, do strive mightily to cast from yourself everything that is of this world, and trample it underfoot. Many Traditional Catholics are still trying to serve two masters, as Pope Pius XII was training everybody to do. The Kingdom of God is not of this world, as Our Lord Jesus Christ told Pontious Pilate. And rest assured the triumph of the Immaculate Heart is coming- is even at the door, and will be more wonderful than we can imagine. The Church will be restored in a wonderful manner, even if ST Peters and Rome are reduced to ashes.
Thank you so much for your clear and thoughtful response, WW. There is hope in what you say.
Reading through your Substack, I see you have at least similar thoughts to mine on Archbishop LeFevre (the bearded one lol). I view him as controlled opposition. It also seems to me that his recognize and resist position resulted in de facto schism by recognizing the Pope, yet disobeying his "legitimate" jurisdictional orders. Do you see his as schismatic? If so, would that not invalidate any grace his ordinations would presume to confer? I'm trying to understand whether there is anywhere I can legitimately go to receive the Eucharist without being complicit in heresy/schism. I'm consoled by the thought I still have recourse to confession in spite of doubts, but I still wonder about the Eucharist and whether my only option is spiritual communion.
A quick clarification, I've come across information to indicate LeFevre was a heretic; I mean, he signed onto all the V2 docs. Maybe I got confused in saying that the crime of schism invalidates ordination, but I recall St. Thomas Aquinas actually wrote on invalid ordination in reference to heretics, which LeFevre would seem to qualify as. Thoughts?
Yes, Archbishop Lefebvre signed all the Vatican II documents, except I think for Lumen Gentium. Be that as it may, one can repudiate a heresy. Heresy is not like Baptism. It does not leave an indelible mark on the soul.
Nothing invalidates ordination, just as nothing invalidates confirmation or baptism. All three of these sacraments leave an indelible mark upon the soul. A priest can be "laicized" and prohibited from exercising any licit ministry, but nothing can take away the power of Orders, once conferred.
One can recognize a pope, yet legitimately resist him. The Pope does not have absolute authority over the Church to do anything he pleases. For a pope to act contrary to the Faith would not be law but violence against the tranquility of order. There is nothing wrong with Lefebvre's position, my growing problem with the Archbishop is he seems to have been in league with the other Satanic Pederasts who were under Pope Paul VI.
Moreover, the mainstream SSPX has departed from the positions of the Archbishop. Their "marriage tribunals" in particular come close to establishing a parallel magisterium. The SSPX can do certain things and still enjoy an Apostolic Mandate under the conditions of supplied jurisdiction. But they cannot willy nilly use the "crisis in the church" as a justification for everything under the sun.
The SSPX Resistance" adheres to the original position of the SSPX, but their priests are perverts. And many of the mainline SSPX priests also appear to be perverts- definitely the hierarchy of the SSPX is infested. At this point, I would advise people to stay away from that Hot Steaming Mess, not because of canonical issues, but just old-fashioned corruption.
WW, please excuse me, but I used to think you were a little crazy when you first showed up on my radar while watching the Rundown. Now, I find I agree with you on so many things and you get me thinking on others. What am I missing about Our Lady of Fatima? The timing of the secrets and the nondisclosure of the 3rd secret have me suspicious that a preternatural event was swung into a psyop. What am I missing? What are your thoughts on the secrets? The one about a Great War in the second part of the 20th century confuses me. Like it never came true.
A lot of people thought I was crazy, and many still do. You are very correct that Fatima- which was a Supernatural, not a Preternatural, (supernatural refers to that which is beyond the nature of something- for example, for a stone to walk would be supernatural for a stone, but completely natural for a dog. But for a dog to be doing integral calculus would be supernatural for the dog...) event, was definitely swung into a psyop. The best way to see this is to simply "flip the script" and see "The Good Guys" as the bad guys.
Let us start with the Cardinal patriarch of Lisbon (Lisboa) in 1917, during the apparitions. He was absolutely opposed to them, and forbid his priests from discussing them.
Then, in the wake of the apparitions, after the Miracle of the Sun, a Bishop De Silva is appointed to the newly reconstituted diocese of Lieria. One of the very first things this bishop does is have St Sr Lucia transferred from her home and sent to a school where nobody knows her, and she is given an alias and forbidden to discuss the apparitions. And this is all done to "discern" whether the apparitions are from God. (As if all the wonderful events in 1917 were not more than enough to discern this was from Heaven!- the Miracle of the Sun was predicted three months in advance, at the July Apparition!) Our Lady said she would work the miracle "so that all might believe"! Where was the Cardinal on Oct 13th, 1917? And then when Little St Jacinta died, the cardinal was informed at a Holy Name meeting that one of the prominent members was attending to Jacinta's funeral, and the cardinal apparently thought this uproarously hilarious.
Of course, the Portugease and Spanish laity were absolutely devoted to the apparitions, so the bishops played along. But meanwhile the bishops and the vatican did everything imaginable for 10 years to try and bury the apparitions.
When they saw about 1929 or so that they were not succeeding, they took a new tact- they decided they would attempt to distort the apparitions. This first started in earnest with Pius XII. He did everything imaginable to silence and bury St Sr Lucia- that is why she was sent to a Carmelite Cloister in Combria the foundation of which is very suspicious. Pius XII performed several "consecrations" of Russia and the World, none of which fulfilled Our lady's conditions, while everybody pretended that Pius XII had "bad advisors"- how often do we hear that canard!- and so did not know the truth. Meanwhile, Sr Pascalina- Pius XII's intimate housekeeper- said Pius XII himself saw the Miracle of the Sun in the Vatican gardens shortly before he proclaimed the dogma of the assumption- another crumb for the Traditionalists- in 1950. I also think it was Pius XII who had St Sr Lucia murdered in 1958 because she wanted the secret revealed before 1960. Some ten years later, in 1967, they would trot out a fraudulent "Sr Lucia" for when Paul VI came to Fatima for the jubilee.
And meanwhile, shortly after 1960, we have the disastrous Vatican II, which was the Freemasonic coming-out-party, and then the "New Mass" which had in actuality been contrived way before the council, the council just being a cover.
Our Lady said the world would be punished by war, famine, and persecutions of the Holy Father, which I think means that the Chair of Peter would refuse to exercise its legitimate and authentic authority, but rather pretend to use its authority against the Faith and against natural authority, such as that of parents. We have been seeing that for over 50 years now, beginning with the illegal "Promulgation" of the "New Mass and Sacraments", which I do think is the Abomination of Desolation spoken of by Daniel the Prophet.
And lastly, of course, is the completely bogus secret released in 2000, which many who should know better have promoted as an authentic writing of St Sr Lucia, even though it is completely contrary to her style, and contains theological errors.
I could say a whole lot more. Hope this is a good start.
Be of Good Heart. The Immaculate Heart will triumph!
Awesome post. There is a lot more for me to dive into here. I want to believe in Our Lady of Fatima. I have no doubts about La Salette, Lourdes, etc. Thank you for your post on Akita because your take was refreshingly logical, with a healthy skepticism.
A good place to start is "Fatima in Twillight" by Mark Fellows. And read "The Undermining of the Church" by Mary Ball Martinez. Also read "The Star Spangled Heresy" By Solange Hertz. And read "The Devils Final Battle" by Fr Paul Kramer, and "The Book of Destiny" by Fr Bernard Kramer. Then Read "Dark Alliance" by Gary Webb. Those will give you some perspective on the length and breadth of the present apostasy and problems in the world.
Great stuff, WW. As I understand it, a whole lot of plaster of paris has been used to "reconstruct" these giant creatures that fascinated so many Boomers, including me. Is there one verified dinosaur fossil that is all bone, and no plaster of paris? I have to admit they have helped make some great movies. So has Santa Claus. Thanks!
You should really try and get Agent131711 to make an appearance on "I Protest". His series has some excellent research, along the lines of "Masking the Truth". From Germs to the Big Bang, the "Halls of Science" have been feeding us bovine excrement for a long time. It's time to start connecting the proverbial dots.
Yes, I'd be interested in that. You didn't link to his article. Do you know his contact info? Thanks.
If you just plug in "Agent131711" into Google or The Duck his substack link comes right up. On his substack "Dinosaurs are FAKE: The KRONOSAURUS & SHONISAURUS Water Dinos Edition - Part 3" is the first article on the list. The Link appears to be: https://substack.com/home/post/p-146222515
I don't have his contact info, and it is danged hard to get his attention. You cannot even post a comment to his free articles unless you are a paid subscriber.
I was able to message him. We'll see if he replies. Thanks.
Another question for you, WW, and this is more important to me: where do you go for sacraments? I’ve been leaning to the home alone position and it’s got me near despair.
I have not received any sacrament for three months now, although I have an independent priest whom I trust (just barely) coming to give me the sacraments for First Saturday, August 3rd. If you know of any priest who is not a pervert, is validly ordained, and offers the Traditional Mass, receive the sacraments from him. If you are in the state of mortal sin, go to even a Novus ordo priest for confession. (We may receive the sacraments of the dead-baptism and Confession- from doubtful priests.) Of course, if the priest is a notorious heretic- stay away absolutely.
People who go to the FSSP and SSPX must discern, based on local conditions. There may be some good priests in the SSPX, ignorant of the overall situation- though after the Fr Rostand affair, I am afraid if they are not investigating they are cowards and trying to hide from the truth.
In the meantime, Our Lady of Fatima foresaw these times, as did St Sr Lucia. In her epochal conversation with Fr Fuentes in December 1957, St Sr Lucia said: "Father, in these last times in which we are living, the Blessed Virgin has given a new efficacy to the praying of the Holy Rosary. This in such a way that there is no problem that cannot be resolved by praying the Rosary, no matter how difficult it is - be it temporal or above all spiritual - in the spiritual life of each of us or the lives of our families, be they our families in the world or Religious Communities, or even in the lives of peoples and nations. I repeat, there is no problem, as difficult as it may be, that we cannot resolve at this time by praying the Holy Rosary. With the Holy Rosary we will save ourselves, sanctify ourselves, console Our Lord and obtain the salvation of many souls."
As long as you are faithfully praying your rosary, take hope, gather strength, and push forward. Our Lady will NEVER abandon you. And you will see her graces in your life. Meanwhile, do strive mightily to cast from yourself everything that is of this world, and trample it underfoot. Many Traditional Catholics are still trying to serve two masters, as Pope Pius XII was training everybody to do. The Kingdom of God is not of this world, as Our Lord Jesus Christ told Pontious Pilate. And rest assured the triumph of the Immaculate Heart is coming- is even at the door, and will be more wonderful than we can imagine. The Church will be restored in a wonderful manner, even if ST Peters and Rome are reduced to ashes.
Be of good heart, and rejoice in the Lord always.
Thank you so much for your clear and thoughtful response, WW. There is hope in what you say.
Reading through your Substack, I see you have at least similar thoughts to mine on Archbishop LeFevre (the bearded one lol). I view him as controlled opposition. It also seems to me that his recognize and resist position resulted in de facto schism by recognizing the Pope, yet disobeying his "legitimate" jurisdictional orders. Do you see his as schismatic? If so, would that not invalidate any grace his ordinations would presume to confer? I'm trying to understand whether there is anywhere I can legitimately go to receive the Eucharist without being complicit in heresy/schism. I'm consoled by the thought I still have recourse to confession in spite of doubts, but I still wonder about the Eucharist and whether my only option is spiritual communion.
A quick clarification, I've come across information to indicate LeFevre was a heretic; I mean, he signed onto all the V2 docs. Maybe I got confused in saying that the crime of schism invalidates ordination, but I recall St. Thomas Aquinas actually wrote on invalid ordination in reference to heretics, which LeFevre would seem to qualify as. Thoughts?
Yes, Archbishop Lefebvre signed all the Vatican II documents, except I think for Lumen Gentium. Be that as it may, one can repudiate a heresy. Heresy is not like Baptism. It does not leave an indelible mark on the soul.
Nothing invalidates ordination, just as nothing invalidates confirmation or baptism. All three of these sacraments leave an indelible mark upon the soul. A priest can be "laicized" and prohibited from exercising any licit ministry, but nothing can take away the power of Orders, once conferred.
One can recognize a pope, yet legitimately resist him. The Pope does not have absolute authority over the Church to do anything he pleases. For a pope to act contrary to the Faith would not be law but violence against the tranquility of order. There is nothing wrong with Lefebvre's position, my growing problem with the Archbishop is he seems to have been in league with the other Satanic Pederasts who were under Pope Paul VI.
Moreover, the mainstream SSPX has departed from the positions of the Archbishop. Their "marriage tribunals" in particular come close to establishing a parallel magisterium. The SSPX can do certain things and still enjoy an Apostolic Mandate under the conditions of supplied jurisdiction. But they cannot willy nilly use the "crisis in the church" as a justification for everything under the sun.
The SSPX Resistance" adheres to the original position of the SSPX, but their priests are perverts. And many of the mainline SSPX priests also appear to be perverts- definitely the hierarchy of the SSPX is infested. At this point, I would advise people to stay away from that Hot Steaming Mess, not because of canonical issues, but just old-fashioned corruption.
I appreciate your thoughts. Thank you, sir.
Don't thank me. Thank Our Lady. I am just her humble apostle, in the Spirit of St Louis Marie De Montfort.
WW, please excuse me, but I used to think you were a little crazy when you first showed up on my radar while watching the Rundown. Now, I find I agree with you on so many things and you get me thinking on others. What am I missing about Our Lady of Fatima? The timing of the secrets and the nondisclosure of the 3rd secret have me suspicious that a preternatural event was swung into a psyop. What am I missing? What are your thoughts on the secrets? The one about a Great War in the second part of the 20th century confuses me. Like it never came true.
A lot of people thought I was crazy, and many still do. You are very correct that Fatima- which was a Supernatural, not a Preternatural, (supernatural refers to that which is beyond the nature of something- for example, for a stone to walk would be supernatural for a stone, but completely natural for a dog. But for a dog to be doing integral calculus would be supernatural for the dog...) event, was definitely swung into a psyop. The best way to see this is to simply "flip the script" and see "The Good Guys" as the bad guys.
Let us start with the Cardinal patriarch of Lisbon (Lisboa) in 1917, during the apparitions. He was absolutely opposed to them, and forbid his priests from discussing them.
Then, in the wake of the apparitions, after the Miracle of the Sun, a Bishop De Silva is appointed to the newly reconstituted diocese of Lieria. One of the very first things this bishop does is have St Sr Lucia transferred from her home and sent to a school where nobody knows her, and she is given an alias and forbidden to discuss the apparitions. And this is all done to "discern" whether the apparitions are from God. (As if all the wonderful events in 1917 were not more than enough to discern this was from Heaven!- the Miracle of the Sun was predicted three months in advance, at the July Apparition!) Our Lady said she would work the miracle "so that all might believe"! Where was the Cardinal on Oct 13th, 1917? And then when Little St Jacinta died, the cardinal was informed at a Holy Name meeting that one of the prominent members was attending to Jacinta's funeral, and the cardinal apparently thought this uproarously hilarious.
Of course, the Portugease and Spanish laity were absolutely devoted to the apparitions, so the bishops played along. But meanwhile the bishops and the vatican did everything imaginable for 10 years to try and bury the apparitions.
When they saw about 1929 or so that they were not succeeding, they took a new tact- they decided they would attempt to distort the apparitions. This first started in earnest with Pius XII. He did everything imaginable to silence and bury St Sr Lucia- that is why she was sent to a Carmelite Cloister in Combria the foundation of which is very suspicious. Pius XII performed several "consecrations" of Russia and the World, none of which fulfilled Our lady's conditions, while everybody pretended that Pius XII had "bad advisors"- how often do we hear that canard!- and so did not know the truth. Meanwhile, Sr Pascalina- Pius XII's intimate housekeeper- said Pius XII himself saw the Miracle of the Sun in the Vatican gardens shortly before he proclaimed the dogma of the assumption- another crumb for the Traditionalists- in 1950. I also think it was Pius XII who had St Sr Lucia murdered in 1958 because she wanted the secret revealed before 1960. Some ten years later, in 1967, they would trot out a fraudulent "Sr Lucia" for when Paul VI came to Fatima for the jubilee.
And meanwhile, shortly after 1960, we have the disastrous Vatican II, which was the Freemasonic coming-out-party, and then the "New Mass" which had in actuality been contrived way before the council, the council just being a cover.
Our Lady said the world would be punished by war, famine, and persecutions of the Holy Father, which I think means that the Chair of Peter would refuse to exercise its legitimate and authentic authority, but rather pretend to use its authority against the Faith and against natural authority, such as that of parents. We have been seeing that for over 50 years now, beginning with the illegal "Promulgation" of the "New Mass and Sacraments", which I do think is the Abomination of Desolation spoken of by Daniel the Prophet.
And lastly, of course, is the completely bogus secret released in 2000, which many who should know better have promoted as an authentic writing of St Sr Lucia, even though it is completely contrary to her style, and contains theological errors.
I could say a whole lot more. Hope this is a good start.
Be of Good Heart. The Immaculate Heart will triumph!
Awesome post. There is a lot more for me to dive into here. I want to believe in Our Lady of Fatima. I have no doubts about La Salette, Lourdes, etc. Thank you for your post on Akita because your take was refreshingly logical, with a healthy skepticism.
A good place to start is "Fatima in Twillight" by Mark Fellows. And read "The Undermining of the Church" by Mary Ball Martinez. Also read "The Star Spangled Heresy" By Solange Hertz. And read "The Devils Final Battle" by Fr Paul Kramer, and "The Book of Destiny" by Fr Bernard Kramer. Then Read "Dark Alliance" by Gary Webb. Those will give you some perspective on the length and breadth of the present apostasy and problems in the world.
Interesting recommendations. I’ll dive in!