That is thinking from a political perspective, which need not necessarily be the case. This post transcends politics- which is something difficult for Americans to understand. My main thesis is that religion forms culture, and this is the "glue" that holds a people or a nation together. It is not that the religion is DIRECTLY involved in government- and usually that is not good even in the best of circumstances. Rather, the laws of the land reflect the religion. As for other religions- they are tolerated, but adherents of those religions are not allowed to participate in the political process. Rather, such people are relegated to the classical ghettos, where they live in peace but do not influence the greater society.
For example, I am not advocating a Catholic version of the current socialist disaster- rather I am advocating a government that is permeated with religious thinking and governs from religious ideals.
In a Catholic Confessional State, this would boil down to the concept of subsidiarity- where most authority is local and immediate- fathers, guild members, mayors, etc.
Years ago, I wrote a research paper whose thesis was that it was the British, not the Germans, who were primarily to blame for starting WW1. I am sure that Monica Perez was privy to many of the facts which supported my thesis. But I was then, and she is now, not deep enough down the rabbit hole.
All the powers of WW1 and WW2, both Axis and Allies- or Entente, if you will- were captured by the "Masonic Conspiracy". Hitler was just another Bankster Puppet, but a very well-constructed puppet, who fools many even to this day. He posed as the champion of East Europe against the Bolsheviks- which were essentially a Jewish Organization- and led them on the Damned Fool Idealistic Crusade of Operation Barbarossa, which was set up to fail. (It should have succeeded...)
The idea that Cecil Rhodes and Lord Milner and Winston Churchill conjured the Great Wars is an alternate rabbit hole meant to ensnare those able to see through the surface layer or lies put forth by the "court historians".
You are, of course, aware of Grand Master Albert Pike's letter to Guiseppe Mazzini circa 1870? THat is much closer to the truth.
So to boil it down simply your saying a religious state should govern a country and those not in that religion shouldn’t be there?
That is thinking from a political perspective, which need not necessarily be the case. This post transcends politics- which is something difficult for Americans to understand. My main thesis is that religion forms culture, and this is the "glue" that holds a people or a nation together. It is not that the religion is DIRECTLY involved in government- and usually that is not good even in the best of circumstances. Rather, the laws of the land reflect the religion. As for other religions- they are tolerated, but adherents of those religions are not allowed to participate in the political process. Rather, such people are relegated to the classical ghettos, where they live in peace but do not influence the greater society.
For example, I am not advocating a Catholic version of the current socialist disaster- rather I am advocating a government that is permeated with religious thinking and governs from religious ideals.
In a Catholic Confessional State, this would boil down to the concept of subsidiarity- where most authority is local and immediate- fathers, guild members, mayors, etc.
Years ago, I wrote a research paper whose thesis was that it was the British, not the Germans, who were primarily to blame for starting WW1. I am sure that Monica Perez was privy to many of the facts which supported my thesis. But I was then, and she is now, not deep enough down the rabbit hole.
All the powers of WW1 and WW2, both Axis and Allies- or Entente, if you will- were captured by the "Masonic Conspiracy". Hitler was just another Bankster Puppet, but a very well-constructed puppet, who fools many even to this day. He posed as the champion of East Europe against the Bolsheviks- which were essentially a Jewish Organization- and led them on the Damned Fool Idealistic Crusade of Operation Barbarossa, which was set up to fail. (It should have succeeded...)
The idea that Cecil Rhodes and Lord Milner and Winston Churchill conjured the Great Wars is an alternate rabbit hole meant to ensnare those able to see through the surface layer or lies put forth by the "court historians".
You are, of course, aware of Grand Master Albert Pike's letter to Guiseppe Mazzini circa 1870? THat is much closer to the truth.