The Great Plan and Gaslighting

(They were not being prophets- They were Spiking the Ball in the End Zone)

"You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you will do.  He was a murderer from the beginning, and he stood not in the truth; because truth is not in him.  When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof."- Our Lord Jesus Christ.

The Enemies of Our Lord Jesus Christ have two objectives: One is to destroy the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the other is to destroy the Truth of Salvation History.  In the world, if we look carefully, we see this drama everywhere.

Many are familiar with the "Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita, published by the Freemasonic Pius IX (His closest advisor, Marcantonio Pacelli, was a Rothschild Agent.) without naming either the source of the document nor those to whom it was addressed.  

"The Pope, whoever he is, will never come to the secret societies; it is up to the secret societies to take the first step toward the Church, with the aim of conquering both of them," the Instruction begins.  This is pure balderdash.  The Popes had already been cooperating with the Revolution for the better part of a century.  One only need see the deeds of the popes concerning both the American and French Revolutions, which are of a feather.  Noxious Freemasons, such as Ben Franklin, were welcome both in the court of "The Most Catholic King" Louis XVI, and in the Rome of Pius XI.  Bishop Carroll, Patriarch of the American Catholic Church, used to allow Protestants to preach at his quasi-vernacular "liturgies".  (He would have been right at home at Vatican II.)  Pius VII would sign a concordat with Napoleon, giving him the lands and churches stolen during the Revolution.

"The task that we are going to undertake is not the work of a day or of a month, or of a year.  It may last several years, perhaps a century; but in our ranks the soldier dies and the struggle goes on."  Most likely, these words were part of the charter of the Grand Lodge of London when it formed in 1717.  And that was merely the coming out party of the Blackfriars, who had built both the Dutch and the British East India Companies roughly a century before.

"We do not intend to win the Popes to our cause to make them neophytes of our principles, propagators of our ideas,"  the Instruction continues.  "That would be a ridiculous dream.   And if events turn out in some way, if Cardinals or prelates for example of their own free will or by surprise should enter into a part of our secrets this is not at all an incentive for desiring their elevation to the See of Peter.  That elevation would ruin us.  Ambition alone would have led them to apostasy, the requirements of power would Force them to sacrifice us.  What we must ask for, what we should look for and wait for as the jews wait for the Messiah, is a Pope according to our needs."

These words are also a fairy tale.  The Apostate Jews captured the Papacy after the short reign of Celestine V towards the end of the 13th Century.  The "Great Western Schism" was in reality a struggle between power factions and the defenders of the True Church over the Chair of Peter.  This Wolf is going to venture a guess that the Synagogue of Satan installed itself on the Chair of Peter with the accession of Pius II, who definitely seemed more interested in earthly cities rather than heavenly ones.  At any rate, this was the beginning of the string of the notorious "Renaissance Popes".  The culmination was as follows:  "Cardinal Giovanni del Monte was elected Pope in 1550, taking the name Julius III.  He subsequently arranged for Baldovino to adopt Innocenzo, and appointed him as Cardinal-Nephew – the papacy's chief diplomatic and political agent.  He proved totally unsuited to any of these offices, and his continuing relationship with Julius, whose bed he openly shared, created considerable scandal both inside and outside the Church."

The capture of the Chair of Peter had spun out of control, and the plan of centuries was unravelling.  What was needed were "Great Signs and Wonders that would deceive even the elect".  Enter Pius V.  He was a very energetic pope.  He ratified the decrees of the Council of Trent.  He excommunicated Queen Elizabeth.  He promulgated the epochal bull "Quo Primum".  And he organized the Great Crusade against the Ottomans- the Holy League, which won the famous Battle of Lepanto in 1571.  Pius V announced the victory to his cabinet some days before the news reached Rome.  Many regarded this as a miracle, but what if the Battle of Lepanto had been pre-arranged beforehand?  (Considering what we know today- is this really out of the realm of possibility?)  At any rate, Pius V did little to reform the totally corrupt and noxious Roman Curia or Nobility, which was quite likely absolutely infested with Sodomy at this point.

This Wolf is certain the only reason Vatican II did not happen sooner was the prayers and suffrages of many saints over the period, especially in the monasteries of the East.

Not that they did not have "dry runs".  The Synod of Pistoia was convoled on July 31, 1786 by Bishop de Ricci.  Certain "reforms", especially in the matter of the revival of the holding of diocesan synods, the purging of the missals and breviaries of legends, the assertion of episcopal as against papal authority, the curtailing of the privileges of the monastic orders, and improved education for the clergy, read astonishingly like Vatican II.

Pius VI summarily condemned all the decrees of the Synod, summarized as follows: The Catholic Church had no right to introduce new dogmas, but only to preserve in its original purity the faith once delivered by Christ to His apostles, and was infallible only so far as it conforms to Holy Scripture and true tradition; the Church, moreover was a purely spiritual body and had no authority in things secular.  The abuse of indulgences, festivals of saints, and processions was denounced.  The closing of shops on Sunday during divine service was advocated, as was the introduction of the vernacular tongue into the Roman Rite, the issue of editions of liturgical texts for the devotional use of the people that had parallel translations in the vernacular, and recommended the abolition of all monastic orders except that of St. Benedict, the rules of which were to be brought into harmony with modern ideas; nuns were to be forbidden to take vows before the age of 40.  Quite a hodgepodge of traditional and liberal thought.

One sees the Ultramontane Popes happily ruling, while the Lodges are prodding the galloping Revolution in the background.  What is wrong with this picture?  Simple.  Not one of these Popes energetically sought to expose the infiltrators and depose them, from Pius V forward.  They all talked a great line, but utterly failed in the line of action.

It appears to be during the reign of Pius IX that the Great Plan to destroy the Mass shifted into a higher gear.  Let us now listen to a highly placed Illuminati who probably had a grand view from the inside.

Fr  Paul Roca (1830-1893), was ordained in 1858 in the Diocese of Perpignan, France, made an honorary canon in 1869 and ultimately excommunicated for heretical teaching, and being a Freemason.

“The new church" he stated, "which might not be able to retain anything of Scholastic doctrine and the original form of the former Church, will nevertheless receive consecration and canonical jurisdiction from Rome.”

“The divine cult, in the form directed by the liturgy, ceremonial, ritual and regulations of the Roman Church will shortly undergo a transformation at an ecumenical council, which will restore to it the venerable simplicity of the golden age of the Apostles in accordance with the dictates of conscience and modern civilization.”  (Canon Roca said this about 1850.)

Canon Roca also believed this "Ecumenical Council" would forge “a perfect accord between the ideals of modern civilization and the ideal of Christ and His Gospel.  This will be the consecration of the New Social Order and the solemn baptism of modern civilization.”

But his most ominous prediction is as follows: “There is a sacrifice in the offing which represents a solemn act of expiation.  The Papacy will fall; it will die under the hallowed knife which the fathers of the last council will forge.  The Papal Caesar is a host  crowned for the sacrifice.”

Have we not seen these words fulfilled in our day, under the "Pontificate" of Pope Frantic.  Even the "elect" have apparently been deceived.

Our Lady of Fatima was Heaven's last warning to an apostate church masquerading as holy, and to men and women tempted to adopt the materialistic ethos of modern technological civilization, with its luxuries and carefree lifestyles.  And Rome's response was to obstinately ignore and attempt to mutilate the warning of Our Lady.  The Grand Silence would begin during the pontificate of Benedict XV- who surely knew of the Miracle of the Sun the day it happened.

(Important note- This Wolf also believes that something like seven minutes was added to the daylight hours of that epochal day.  This was probably only noticed in very few places- such as the Royal Society in Greenwich England.  But those who did notice, and later learned of subsequent events, probably trembled.  Immanual Kant had said that the only two ontological realities are Space and Time.  Our Lady had just shown she is Queen of both.)

One must be impressed with Canon Roca's confidence.

Then we have the great enigma of Cardinal Pacelli.  Even as he was overseeing Odo Casel and the liberal Benedictines while Nuncio in Bavaria in 1933, he had this to say to Count Enrico Pietro Galeazzi [The same Count Galeazzi is by his side, along with Joseph Kennedy, in 1936, during his mission to suppress Fr Coughlin.] : "Suppose, dear friend, that Communism is the most visible among the organs of subversion against the Church and the Tradition of Divine Revelation.  Thus, we will witness the invasion of everything that is spiritual: philosophy, science, law, teaching, the arts, the media, literature, theater, and religion."

Ya think?  Cardinal Pacelli had to have known that "Communism" was the Kabbalistic Brainchild of the Banking Families.  This was thoroughly documented in testimony before the United States Congress in the 1920's.  Meanwhile, Pacelli continues: "I am concerned about the confidences of the Virgin to the little Lucia of Fatima. This persistence of the Good Lady in face of the danger that threatens the Church is a divine warning against the suicide that the alteration of the Faith, in its liturgy, its theology, and its soul, would represent."

Now, recall that this is in 1933.  Not one word of the "secrets" of July 13th, 1917 had yet been revealed by St Sr Lucia, so Cardinal Pacelli is just "spitballing" here.  Now, what he could have known was that Our Lady had predicted the end of "The First World War" and future woes to come if people did not pray and do penance.  Was Cardinal Pacelli trying to distort Fatima by conflating it with the Great Plan?

"I hear around me innovators who wish to dismantle the Sacred Chapel, destroy the universal flame of the Church, reject her ornaments, and make her remorseful for her historical past. Well, my dear friend, I am convinced that the Church of Peter must affirm her past, or else she will dig her own grave."  One of those innovators was Pius XI.  And when he became Pius XII, Cardinal Pacelli would, at the very least, aid and abet other "innovators".  Most certainly he would not oppose them, as he approved the "revision" of Holy Week, practically abolished the ancient Communion Fast, and allowed Evening Masses for the first time in Church History.  Talk about accommodating to modern civilization!

"I will fight this battle with the greatest energy on the inside of the Church, just as outside of it, even if the forces of evil may one day take advantage of my person, my actions, or my writings, as they try today to deform the history of the Church.  All human heresies which alter the word of God are so that a greater light might appear.”

That last sentence is exceedingly strange.  Could that "greater light" be that of the Freemasonic Lightbearer, Lucifer?

"[The] underdeveloped peoples will save the Church, Eminence.  A day will come when the civilized world will deny its God, when the Church will doubt as Peter doubted.  She will be tempted to believe that man has become God, that His Son is only a symbol, a philosophy like so many others.  And in churches, Christians will search for the red lamp where Jesus awaits them, like the sinful woman crying out before the empty tomb: ‘Where have they taken Him?’"

The phrase "underdeveloped peoples" comes from the lips of an Evolutionist.  Meanwhile, Cardinal Pacelli is not making a prediction, but a statement of fact.  Being on the inside, he knows exactly what the goal is, and is confident the conspiracy will achieve it.

"Then, priests will rise up from Africa, from Asia, from America, formed here in this seminary of the Missions, who will say and who will proclaim that the ‘bread of life’ is not ordinary bread, that the mother of the God-man is not a mother like others.  And they will be cut to pieces to testify that Christianity is not a religion like others, since her head is the Son of God, and the Church is His Church."

No, priests have risen, especially from South America, to inject Paganism and Devil Worship directly into the Vatican, along with the Rite of Sodomy.

Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us.  You are our only hope!