Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark's avatar

Hi Wolf, I very much enjoyed your conversation with Dr. Haugen, I appreciated your sincerity and didn't misinterpret your self-evidently knowledge and truth based opinions as personal hubris since I have independent verification of many points. Your honest style mostly carries one over pieces of information that may be new and concerning. Having said that I would like to hear a conversation that presents evidence, for example, of your assertions about +Williamson. A fair criticism to make of you (I believe) is that anonymous revelations such as these may at least appear to carry the risk of being calumnious (I assume that you have good faith reasons for believing they are not), but in what way are they not amounting to detraction, unless these facts (my assumption, assuming your good faith, but I've not seen other sources so cannot be certain) are actually quite widely known, sufficient at least that disclosure to a wider audience is not detraction.

You won't be surprised to hear that you divided opinion, men tend to strongly approve as do particularly robust members of the fair sex who no longer entertain nice illusions in any significant degree. Doug seemed nervous in the first half but got in his stride later. I expect he feared you might be a loose cannon. He need not have feared, I know from having followed you for a while and reading all your content that you have a masterful command of the metanarrative. In some posts you stamp on our toes mercilessly but in others reveal glimpses of being conciliatory to the genuinely ignorant. There is a challenge for us, I think I've subscribed and later unsubscribed at least twice because of some particularly forthright post with which I felt exasperated. But I came back seeing another post of exceptional quality.

My point being that a two hour conversation is a much more holistic opportunity for your great strengths to greatly outweigh any weaknesses. Doug has the humility and sincere desire for truth to give you your head and there is strong support from his audience for more. I'd like to see you working cooperatively together which will take work as, like me, you are choleric in temperament (I think), but he is not. Choleric tempered by age and experience, he does appreciate in my experience of him.

I'd love to hear conversations going in depth into the historic development of the ecclesia-simulacra. I believe a hatchet job on Catholic influencers is unnecessary and could sound off. We all know their faults. Let's have a few deep dives, maybe starting from the Scholastic summit?

Thanks again and God bless you!

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts