How and Why the Jews Created America

The Eye of the Battle for Christendom.

Obviously, this is a heady thesis, and one Huge Black Horse Pill many are going to find it hard to swallow, let alone digest.  While most well-researched "conspiracy theorists" now believe that the United States went horribly off track under "Honest Abe" during the War for Southern Independence, many still hold that the "Founding Fathers" were shining philanthropists who put life and fortune on the line for the betterment of mankind.  They also hold that the American Revolution was a shining beacon to the world, inspired from On High so that Progress might dawn from Sea to Shining Sea.  This will be an attempt to set the record straight.
But first off, just what exactly is a Jew?  Many will answer that they are the Sons of Abraham who did not recognize Our Lord Jesus Christ as the Messiah, and continue to follow the Law of Moses and await the end of the Diaspora when they can build a Third Temple, sacrifice their bulls, and pray facing Jerusalem.  As far as this Wolf is concerned, that is not a Jew.  Rather, the modern Jew believes not in the God of Abraham, Issac, and Jacob, but rather the God of Utility, Progress, and Racism.  The modern Jew stems from the apostates of the Babylonian Captivity who decided that the God of Moses was eclipsed by the Gods of Babylon and concocted an amalgamation of the Torah, Zoroastrianism, and the Occult Practices surrounding the Worship of Moloch and Baal.  The results were the germ of the Talmud and the Kabbalah, the two "Holy Books" of modern Judaism, although the first would not be perfected until sometime in the 4th century, when the final chapters concerning the demise of Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Apostles were added by the Rabbi Himmel.  
In the meantime, the Jews would attain and invent occupations through which they could exploit the "goyim", mainly through banking and law.  They first infiltrated the Roman Empire in the days following the spread of the Gospel.  Being banished along with the pagans, they settled into ghettos, patiently waiting for better days.  About this time, the Khazars of the Crimea adapted the "religion of Abraham", but the history is somewhat obscure, and this Wolf will not fuss about bloodlines and etc, preferring instead to identify the Jew by his societal characteristics, which is dominated by a quest for material gain, and the cultivation of slavery.  These are the two hallmarks which define the Jew throughout history.
Closer to our time, we have the Jewish Banking Houses of Genoa and Venice, which flourished in the 14th and 15th Centuries. These were at the European end of the "silk road" which conducted trade with the Far East, primarily for exotic spices, and this trade made both Genoa and Venice extremely wealthy, so that they might finance the wars and intrigues which plagued Christendom, from Rome to Warsaw, and London to Berlin.  Through his vast reading of alternative sources, this Wolf is convinced that the bulk of the Crusades had little to do with making Palestine safe for Pilgrims, or preserving Holy Places from Muslim sacrilege.  Rather, in the 7th Century the "Prophet Mohammed" seems to have been the work of the recently established Khazarian Empire, which stretched across the Caucasus.  The "Muslim Hordes" were not really interested in establishing the Religion of Allah over a crumbling Arabian and African Christendom, but rather dedicated to plunder and pillage.  But guiding the Muslim Hordes was a power with a wider geopolitical objective- blocking the access of Europe to the Spices of India and the Orient by Sea, so that the overland route through Khazaria was the only option.  The subsequent Crusades would be waged to try and regain access to India by a sea route, so that merchants could be spared the taxes of the Khazarian Mafia.  The same would inspire the journeys of Marco Polo, who tried to find a more northern route to China, and subsequently across Tibet to the Southern Orient.  For about three centuries, the Crusades were successful, more or less, and spices flowed into Europe from the southeastern Mediterranean.  But then the Ottoman Turks came into power, and they successfully overcame the divisions of the Muslim World and established a powerful monolithic empire.  They pushed the decadent Crusaders out of the Middle East and would eventually sack Constantinople in 1453, which had epic consequences.
One of those epic consequences was the severance of the spice trade and the rupture of the prosperity of Genoa and Venice.  The two, which had been in constant rivalry since the spice trade of the crusades, now made peace and also made a migration to the Iberian Peninsula.  The goal?  Find a sea route bypassing the Mediterranean altogether either by sailing completely around Africa or sailing West to the Spice Islands of the Orient.  (Cinnamon grows primarily on Borneo.)  (Christopher Columbus, unbeknownst to many, was a Genoan.)
If this seems convoluted to the reader so far he has not seen anything yet, because now we must delve into a related but completely different perspective.  Many are familiar with St Dominic and his struggle against the Cathars and the Albigensian heretics.  Both of these essentially Manichean heresies were fomented by the resident Jews of Southern France and Northern Iberia, on both sides of the Pyrenees.  St Dominic, thanks to the Prayers of the Holy Rosary, had much success stemming these tides.  About 150 years later, St Vincent Ferrer, of the same Order of Preachers, would convert many Jews as well.  Trouble was, many of these Jews converted not out of sincerity, but out of convenience.  Some would go on to become archbishops.  They would be a prime factor in the Great Western Schism contemporaneous with St Vincent Ferrer.  But our focus must remain on the Iberian Peninsula, where, after the time of St Vincent Ferrer, the resident Jews of Iberia were joined by those immigrating from Genoa and Venice.  This would produce a veritable witches brew of intrigue, treachery, infiltration, and conspiracy.  And it is during this time, and at this place, that this Wolf believes the Grand Conspiracy was born, a whole series of concentric circles of lies and intrigue around a very simple plot to utterly destroy Altar and Throne.
The goal was, and is, simple, to transfer political and financial power from the legitimate- if corrupt- monarchies of Europe into the hands of the Jewish oligarchs, while at the same time dissolving the spiritual power and supremacy of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.  On the face of it, quite a seemingly insurmountable task.  The strategy was also simple- repeatedly divide and conquer by setting up various poles of controlled opposition between those more materialistic and liberal and those more spiritual and conservative.  To that effect, operations began in earnest in the Spain of Queen Isabella and the Portugal of John II.  The first prong was to establish a sea route to India and the Orient.  The second was to establish Spanish and Portuguese global empires.  And the third was to plant the seeds for a subsequent empire that would usurp the Christian Kings- corrupt though they were- and replace it with a Jewish Banking hegemony.
To that end, the Jews invented one of the masterpieces of political history- the Inquisition.  After all, from the perspective of the Gospels, the very idea of employing violence of any sort to coerce- dare one use the word "extort"- a confession runs counter to every word and action of the Prince of Peace.  And so, in the absolute masterstroke of intrigue, heretic was pitted against heretic in a political theatre that fools many even to this day.  Isabella and her band of Jews pretending to be Christians would expel those Jews they claimed were pretending to be Christians- the technical term was Marrenos- to the Netherlands.  (Some would subsequently migrate to the London of Henry VIII.)  The former were to forge the Spanish and Portuguese World Empires, transfer the coveted slave trade from Muslim to European hands, and monopolize the spice routes.  (The plunder of the treasures of the New World would become a lucrative side hustle.)
The 16th Century would belong to the Spanish and Portuguese, who would establish colonies world wide, organize trade routes, and found mercantile houses.  But when the 17th Century dawned, two important events occurred in the span of just a few short years.  The first was the charter of the Dutch East India Company, established on the 20th of March 1602, and the English East India Company, founded a mere fifteen months previous, on the 31st of December 1600.  When one considers that neither country had a navigator who had even seen the Indian Ocean, to say these were heady adventures is an understatement.  A modern analogy would be opening a publicly traded company to mine iron on the moon.  And yet, inexplicably, both ventures would profit immensely in the coming years, mostly by booty plundered from the rapidly decaying Spanish and Portuguese Empires.  These companies enjoyed total sovereignty and suzerainty over their colonies, even to the extent they could field armies.  
In 1609, an employee of the Dutch East India Company, Sir Henry Hudson, would explore the area that is now New York City. Just a few years previous, Sir Walter Raleigh had invited the Jew, Joachim Gaunse of Bohemia, to use his mining expertise to prospect for minerals in the colony of Roanoke.   Meanwhile, the first settlements in Virginia would be founded by aristocrats intent on raising tobacco for sale.  They would establish plantations that would cater to the British East India Company, although they avoided direct commitments to contractual obligations.  (This would ultimately lead to tensions with the British Crown, as the Tea Tax of the next century would be an example.)

Meanwhile, throughout the 17th Century, both East India Companies utterly gutted the Spanish and Portuguese dominance of the Indian Ocean, with Britain ultimately dominating in terms of territorial gains, although the Dutch dominated in terms of business and trade prowess, establishing huge cities on Jakarta.  This led to far flung mercantile empires that ultimately established themselves in the Caribbean and the American Colonies.  (Mexico and South America, with integral Catholic populations, would prove much tougher nuts to crack.)  The zenith of the Iberian Empire had passed; the dawn of the huge banking conglomerates was on the horizon, and the Conspirators had big plans indeed.
But first, they would need a method of getting recruits from the "goyim" and useful idiots to help further their designs while they could operate behind the scenes.  The solution?  The Masonic Lodges.  The Grand Lodge of London was established in 1717; the "Coming Out" party for the Satanic and Occult Forces had begun.  They wasted little time.  By 1750, the Masonic Lodges had spread across Europe and the Colonized world and claimed bishops, abbots, and kings among their adherents.  The Catholic Church reacted relatively swiftly, proclaiming a total ban on membership in and fraternization with the Freemasonic Lodges in 1738, but the decrees were widely ignored.  The Protestants, of course, had utterly no reason to heed them.
The Lodges became the seedbed of a new type of man- the secular humanist, who dreamed of a fraternity of men divorced from "popery and monkish superstition". Yes, these men might enjoy the beers invented and brewed by monasteries, hunt with the dog breeds and ride the horse breeds developed by generations of siring monks, and profit from agriculture nurtured by the same, but all the while denounce them as backwards, superstitious louts.  Meanwhile, they dreamed of a society freed from the moral and ethical restraints of Christendom, a society where every man "worshipped as he pleased".  Some of them were conspirators.  Some of them were useful idiots, woefully ignorant of the doctrine of Original Sin and the deep wounds inflicted on the human race in the Garden of Eden.  These latter were the second coming of the Pelagians.
The "Founding Fathers" of the United States were absolutely populated with these useful idiots, who had no time for "popery" or "monkish superstitions" and, moreover, dominated the landed gentry and the aristocracy of the British Colonies.  Now, maybe they were not exactly of a mind to "strangle the last king with the guts of the last priest" as were their European counterparts in, say, France, but they certainly had no use for Latin and incense and bells- well, okay, the Liberty Bell, but that only showed the Revolutionaries were not too good at making bells.

That the American Founding Fathers were intimately associated with Freemasonry is beyond dispute.  The Great Seal of the United States is absolutely saturated with Masonic Symbolism and celebrates the Year 1776 as the "Annuit Coeptis" (the Year of Conception) of the "Novus Ordo Seclorum" (New World Order).  And the Masonic Star and Compass virtually shout from a road map of Washington DC.
Now, if one seriously puts the whole American Revolution under the teleological microscope, the whole cover story falls rapidly to pieces.  The notion that the Revolutionary War would be fought over "taxation without representation" is utterly laughable.  The Stamp Act, for example, was an inconvenience to the rich merchants, but hardly a tyranny.  Yes, it pinched those who were printing revolutionary tracts and journalist rags, but little else.  The same could be said for the other "Intolerable Acts" which put hardly a dint in both the above board and especially the smuggling operations of the "Founding Fathers".  Meanwhile, the British East India Company, which was hardly affiliated with the British Crown, put a tax on tea to recoup their expenses incurred in financing the "Continental Army" during the "Seven Years War", (also known as the French and Indian War) against France.  If the "Founding Fathers" were truly indignant over this tax on their beverage, they would have actually sided with King George and put pressure on the Roundheads and their Stock Venture, or just boycotted drinking tea, which the common folk were doing with some success- prompted by the publications of the pamphleteers.
The American Revolutionary War, meanwhile, would be fought between two Treaties of Paris, one forged in 1763 and the other in 1783.  The American Revolutionary War should also be seen in the context of a historic realignment of the Great Powers of Europe, with a long-standing feud between France and the Austro-Hungarian Empire resolved while Prussia gravitated into a formal alliance with England.  The most curious consequence of the 1763 Treaty of Paris was the transference of Canada- in particular- highly civilized Quebec, into the British orbit.  One does wonder why the Protestant British would want the headache of having to govern two bastions of Popery, namely, Montreal and Quebec City.  But in light of what was about to transpire in the "War for Independence", one need not trouble oneself.
But by far the most curious aspect of this whole affair is the reaction of "The Most Catholic King of France", Louis XVI, and Pope Pius VI to the Enlightened Potpourri that was forging the American Experiment.  The latter would write concerning the Enlightenment: "[T]hey... spread this darkness (of secular revolution) abroad and [tear] religion out of men's hearts, these accursed philosophers proceed to destroy the bonds of union among men, both those which unite them to their rulers, and those which urge them to their duty. They keep proclaiming that man is born free and subject to no one, that society accordingly is a crowd of foolish men who stupidly yield to priests who deceive them and to kings who oppress them, so that the harmony of priest and ruler is only a monstrous conspiracy against the innate liberty of man.
"Everyone must understand that such ravings and others like them, concealed in many deceitful guises, cause greater ruin to public calm the longer their impious originators are unrestrained. They cause a serious loss of souls redeemed by Christ's blood wherever their teaching spreads, like a cancer; it forces its way into public academies, into the houses of the great, into the palaces of kings, and even enters the sanctuary, shocking as it is to say so."
Not exactly an endorsement of the American "Founding Fathers".
In that epochal year of 1776, just a few months previous to the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4th, on May 1st to be exact, Adam Weishaupt would found the Bavarian Illuminati, who would infiltrate the Freemasonic Lodges of Continental Europe and turn them into the conspiratorial engines that would spark the French Revolution.  Several of the American Founding Fathers, particularly Benjamin Franklin, were closely involved in this, rubbing elbows with such figures as Maximilien de Robespierre.  (A letter from Robespierre to Franklin dated October 1783 is extant, the subject being lightning rods.  One can suppose they discussed subjects much more profound.)
His Most Catholic Majesty, Louis XVI, did not seem overly concerned that France was being flooded with lodges recruiting men determined to "strangle the last king with the guts of the last priest" or vice versa- they really were not too particular.  Meanwhile, he was downright chummy with the American "Founding Fathers", and a treaty of alliance was ratified in 1777.  Now, one might excuse this bizarre behavior of His Most Catholic Majesty on the grounds of his ongoing tiff with the British Crown. But what are we to make of the fact that Benjamin Franklin, surely one of the more notorious of those "accursed philosophers" denounced above, had the ear of the papal court.  In particular, he was able to get one Father John Carroll nominated as the Spiritual Father to the American Catholics.
Oh, but let us allow Pius XII describe this curious affair about 150 years later in a letter to the American Bishops: "When Pope Pius VI gave you your first Bishop in the person of the American John Carroll and set him over the See of Baltimore, small and of slight importance was the Catholic population of your land. At that time, too, the condition of the United States was so perilous that its structure and its very political unity were threatened by grave crisis. Because of the long and exhausting war the public treasury was burdened with debt, industry languished and the citizenry wearied by misfortunes was split into contending parties. This ruinous and critical state of affairs was put aright by the celebrated George Washington, famed for his courage and keen intelligence. He was a close friend of the Bishop of Baltimore. Thus the Father of His Country and the pioneer pastor of the Church in that land so dear to Us, bound together by the ties of friendship and clasping, so to speak, each the other's hand, form a picture for their descendants, a lesson to all future generations, and a proof that reverence for the Faith of Christ is a holy and established principle of the American people, seeing that it is the foundation of morality and decency, consequently the source of prosperity and progress."
Yes, the world in 1939 had certainly come a long way from the days of the "accursed philosophers" of the Enlightenment.  But back to our story.
Bishop John Carroll was just the man for a land dominated by men who abhorred Popery and Monkish Superstitions.  Long before Central Intelligence Agency mole Father John Courtney Murray introduced Liberty, Fraternity, and Equality to the 2nd Vatican Council in 1962, Bishop John Carroll was doing the same for the Catholics of Baltimore in 1776.  He had a penchant for vernacular liturgies, and also allowed the Protestant "Separated Brethren" to mount the pulpits of his churches.  A Jesuit, he was an ecumenical powerhouse miles and miles ahead of the Ultramontane pack.  Bishop John Carroll was the founding father of that most peculiar institution, the American Catholic Church, always at arms length from those moldering, unenlightened papal states, and always ready to assist the Washingtonians in spreading Freedom, Enlightenment, and Progress to a world groaning under the yoke of the despotic monarchies of Europe. (If you did not catch the sarcastic pun there, you are not paying attention.)
(Following in his footsteps, the American and Canadian Bishops would issue a proclamation in 1914 that exempted their flocks from the Friday Abstinence from meat so they could celebrate the legacy of Abraham Lincoln.  But we're getting well ahead of the story here.)
This apparent endorsement by the Vatican was the foundation for the most celebrated setback to the American cause, the invasion of Canada.  An Embassy composed of Ben Franklin, Samuel Chase, Charles Carroll, and Father John Carroll was confident they could woo the French Catholics to the Colonial Cause, but the Bishop of Montreal would have none of it, and interdicted any priest or party that dared to receive the Colonials.  The mission was a disaster, and the rebels retreated back to base.  One does suspect this was the only major setback for the Freemasonic plan, forcing General Howe to practically expose the clown act.
Yes, the way for the British to win the Revolutionary War was:
A.  To disenfranchise the Tories by having the British Army commit atrocious acts against those sympathetic to the Rebel Cause, and to further cause agitation by having Prussian mercenaries (The Hessians) do most of the fighting, giving at least the impression that those sympathetic to the Crown were in a minority.
B.  Ignoring the more populous Loyal organizations in the Southern Colonies who could have defeated several of the Colonial Assemblies and stopped the flow of supplies to the Northern Rebels.
C.  Divert the bulk of British arms, men, and supplies to the East India Company so they could settle a tiff with the Dutch East India company over Indian ports.
D.  Not bother to blockade Fort Ticonderoga or other posts on the Great Lakes from which the Colonials could get valuable resources from the Indians.
E.  Not bother to follow up on routs of Colonial Forces but rather to merrily banquet in Philadelphia while the Colonials are practically starving only a few miles away at Valley Forge.
F.  Allow the French Navy, which the British had bested in war after war, to control the High Seas during the latter part of the conflict, a decisive factor in the final fall of the British Expeditionary Force at Yorktown.
Then would come the most curious treaty of Paris in 1783.  You would think the first thing the French might want is the return of Canada.  Nope.  You would think that the Spanish would demand retention of the Bahama Islands, Grenada, and Montserrat, which they had captured during the war.  Nope.  Florida would be returned to Spain, but without a clear boundary.  (Wonder who would ultimately benefit from that?)  In retrospect, you would have thought the British had actually won the war.  (Well, they had bested the Dutch in the Indian Ocean.)
Moreover, after the war, trade between Britain and the fledgling United States would soon exceed the pre-war volume.  After all, if you cannot beat your enemies, might as well finance them.
As for the United States, it would quickly embark on an all-out war against Christendom in the Americas.  Some quick highlights:
1803: Louisiana Purchase.
1810: The Republic of West Florida was annexed by proclamation of President James Madison.  (This was the inauguration of a formula that would later be used in Texas- fund malcontents to stage an insurrection against Spain who would proclaim an independent Republic, then have said area petition for incorporation into the US.)
1814: Chile and Argentina become "Independent Nations", following the tumult of the Napoleonic Wars oversees   Most of South America and Mexico will rapidly follow.
1819: Adams–Onís Treaty cedes Florida to the US.
1821: Oregon Territory annexed by United States.
1845: Texas Annexed.
1848: The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, following war with Mexico, cedes California, Arizona, and New Mexico to the United States.
As one can see, the United States was an instant beneficiary of the planned demise of the Iberian Empire, then in its final stages.

Meanwhile, back at the Vatican, Pope Pius VI's successor, Pius VII, had this to say concerning the "Accursed Philosophers" of the Enlightenment: "The form of democratic government adopted among you, dearly beloved, in no way contradicts the maxims I have previously stated, nor is it repugnant to the Gospel; it demands all the sublime virtues that are learned only at the school of Jesus Christ and that, practiced religiously among you, will make for your happiness and contribute to the glory and renown of our Republic...Yes! My dear sisters and brothers, be good Christians, and you will be excellent democrats."

How has that worked out?