Editing A Message From Heaven

The Climax Of A Century Of Deceit

For centuries, the Vatican has been a den of liars and thieves, and, now, slowly, for those paying attention, Our Lady of Fatima is giving the whole game of the Vatican Away.  The Avalanche really started with the revelations of the Imposter Sister Lucia. But momentum had been building, especially with the progressive indications that the Holy Week Innovations during the Pontificate of Pius XII were not exactly angelic, being sponsored by a "Liturgy Committee" under the direction of no less than Monsignor Anibale Bugnini, styled as the Great Architect of the "New Mass" following Vatican II.  (That was all just merely a performance, as the "New Mass" was in existence during the days of Odo Casel, and probably dates to the 1850's and the Masonic Lodges of the Carboroni, but that is a topic for another day.)  

Today, rather, we are going to focus on a Colossal Load of Bovine Excrement dumped on Holy Mother Church for the pinnacle of the "Jubilee" in the year 2000- namely, the "Third Secret of Fatima".  Some have argued that this Hot Steaming Mess actually came from the pen of St Sr Lucia, and, though not the Third Secret, which begins with "In Portugal the Dogma of the Faith will always be preserved..." and ends with the "In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me, and she shall be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world” is a supplementary vision.  This Wolf finds such an idea noxious.  Meanwhile, Vatican prelates have catered to this idea, as has Antonio Socci in his book "The Fourth Secret of Fatima".  (Oh, Antonio, how could you believe ANYTHING coming from a Vatican Prelate?  If Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone said it was raining, this Wolf would be tempted to look out a window just to be sure.  This tale of Monsignor Capovilla having one envelope and the Auxiliary Bishop of Fatima scrutinizing another makes for a Great "Get Smart" episode, but is a Cosmic Distraction so far as this Wolf is concerned.)

Let's cut to the chase.  The "Third Secret" begins thusly: "After the two parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: 'Penance, Penance, Penance!'."  Just this single sentence has so many irregularities it boggles the mind.  First off, St Sr Lucia had not explained "two parts", rather she had cited a vision of Hell and then dictated the words of Our Lady.  (Let us forget for a moment that the words "In Portugal...etc" exist.)  One can see that our mythological construct is already biased, before even putting meat on the bones of what is forming in the imagination of the author, by the nomenclature of Fatima scholars, who arbitrarily divide the July "secret" into three parts, that concerning the vision of Hell, the request for the Consecration of Russia, and that as yet to be revealed, the "third secret".  When St Sr Lucia allegedly put pen to paper to write this, that construction was in the far future.

Meanwhile, the imagination of the author is not even settled.  Lucia sees an angel with a flaming sword.  Then it flashes, and flames dart towards the earth, only to be extinguished by the "splendor" which radiates from Our Lady's Right hand.  Why so wordy?  Why not just say: "I saw a vision of Our Lady and an Angel.  Fire darted from the angel's flaming sword as though to set our world afire, but was extinguished by the splendor of Our Lady's Right Hand." ?  But since our author is going to give all this forensic detail, one sees immense problems.  First off, God and Holy Mother Church are always Right Handed.  If an Angel was holding a sword, it should be in the right hand.  Moreover, if the Angel is to the left of Our Lady, the vision would look extremely awkward if Our Lady was extinguishing the fire with her Right Hand, which is furthest away from the Angel's Left Hand, which is furthest away from the world, which, while not stated, is presumably between and below them.  (Any other location would make the vision even more awkward.)  But let us return to the wordiness of the preamble. This Wolf believes the reason is that the author does not have the "vision" definitely in his imagination yet.  He is fleshing it out as he writes.  And any subsequent editing is much to be feared, because the author knows his words are going to be placed in the most powerful teleological microscopes for years to come, whereas St Sr Lucia, had she written such stilted prose, would probably have crossed the sentence out and started over.  So, in his quest to imitate the stylized, flowing penmanship of St Sr Lucia, he overshoots the mark.  One can see he starts out slowly and hesitantly: "at the left of Our Lady and a little above", "looked as though they would set the world on fire", before stating a definitive action.

And that first definitive action is so highly problematic.  In fact, when this Wolf first read the secret two decades ago, it was this first sentence that shouted that the entire account was a fraud.  Our Lady and the Holy Angels, from all Eternity, have been perfectly obedient to the Will of God.  Knowing this, Our Lady would never "countermand" by her actions, an Angel executing Divine Judgment.  She might weep over the reality, but she would not dare to interfere.  Our author would have been much closer to the mark if he would have written of an Angel holding a Flaming Sword while pointing to the earth and crying, as did Our Lady of Lourdes, "Penance, Penance, PENANCE!"  That would have intrigued this Wolf.  And, of course, we can rule out a Rebellious Angel, because a devil asking for reparation for sin is nonsense.

Continuing with the "Secret", we have:  "And we saw in an immense light that is God: 'something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it' a Bishop dressed in White 'we had the impression that it was the Holy Father'.  This whole sentence tells us absolutely nothing with the most dramatic flare.  It is "word salad" in the tradition of Pope John Paul II.  Why would not St Sr Lucia simply say: "I saw a vision of the Holy Father..."?  Allegedly, she continues with a sentence fragment: "Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark..."

The words, "Cork-Tree" seem a desperate attempt to add some literary color to what is otherwise a very drab description.  It also raises a whole host of interesting problems.  First off, while Portugal is indeed the cork capital of the world, and groves of cork trees are quite common, and derived products, such as cork sandals, plenteous in Portuguese shops, the familiarity of St Sr Lucia with this type of tree is highly debatable.  Natural cork groves, we are told, occur in Portugal at elevations from 490 to 890 feet above sea level.  But Fatima is 1109 feet above sea level.  Now, cork trees do grow in Spain up to a mile above sea level, but these appear to be a different variety.  Furthermore, in descriptions of Fatima, olive trees are most plentiful, with fig trees being cultivated nearer to homes.  In all the accounts of Fatima, the cork tree is not even mentioned, leading this Wolf to conclude no cork trees were in the immediate vicinity of the "stomping grounds" of the three shepherd children.  Now, did St Sr Lucia subsequently become acquainted with cork trees at Pontevedra, Rianjo, and Tuy during her sojourns there?  Absolutely no indication exists to speculate this might have been the case.  At any rate, the twisted, spindly nature of cork trees, with their characteristically fat bases, low branching, and rapidly dwindling trunks, would make them a most unlikely candidate for construction of a "rough hewn cross".  Much better candidates would have been the maritime pine or the common aldar.

"Before reaching there" the "Secret" Continues,  "the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way."  Now, suddenly, the "Bishop in White" IS the Holy Father.  He is obviously downright miserable and tired.  The "Big City", presumably Rome, is "half in ruins" and bodies are strewn about.  And why would St Sr Lucia use the expression "souls of the corpses" when she could have simply used the word "dead"?  St Sr Lucia is always direct and to the point as is Our Lady.  "The demons could be distinguished by their terrifying and repulsive likeness to frightful and unknown animals, all black and transparent," St Sr Lucia says in her description of Hell.  "You have seen Hell where poor sinners go," says Our Lady, "In order to save them, God wishes to establish in the world devotion to My Immaculate Heart."  No vagaries, no extravagant phrases.  Just a frightful economy of words and exacting descriptions.  The author of our "secret" is doing a quite horrible job in trying to imitate this style.

"Having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him..." the "Secret" continues.  One would ask just exactly why the Holy Father, upon fleeing Rome, would be climbing mountains.  Would he not rather retire to a safe location and attempt to assess the situation?  In fact, if Rome is only "half destroyed", why flee at all?  And if the city is not Rome, why not flee back to the Eternal City?  After contemplating this "secret", one is left with many more questions than answers.  (Which actually seems to be the whole point.  The Vatican has always, under cover of piety and feigned compliance, sought to maximize confusion regarding Our Lady's message, giving often cryptic and conflicting observations from a range of clerics from Fr Dhanis to Cardinal Ottoviani to Cardinal Ratzinger to Pius XII himself.)  Meanwhile, the words "bullets" and "arrows" do not really go together.  Is this an attempt to brand St Sr Lucia as a country clodhopper with a not too good command of the Portuguese language? In modern warfare, do not "bullets and projectiles" or "bullets and cannon fire" sound a more plausible combination?

The "secret concludes: "...And in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions.  Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God."  So we go from bullets and arrows to a "crystal aspersorium".  This Wolf is confident the average person does not know what an "aspersorium" is, although the context makes clear the definition.  Meanwhile, the vision goes from what is supposedly literal to the mystical, or at least the mixed mystical.  And not to sound too dark, but this hints both at Old Testament Practices where the Blood of Sacrificed Bulls was sprinkled on the people, and Modern Masonic and Satanic rites, which often ape defunct Old Testament rituals.

In summary, this vision is a stream of tortured words that show little coherence, depict very problematic actions, describe what is ultimately, when distilled of all the unusual expression, a very generic and expected action of the pope, and leave the outcome a complete mystery.  And that is obviously by design, for if the author said anything specific he runs the risk of either giving the whole Freemasonic Grand Plan away or being contradicted by subsequent history, neither of which would work in favor of the Conspiracy.  So, instead, we are given a series of vaguries that has led to endless speculation both by the "Fatamists" and the opponents of Our Lady.  Meanwhile, Socci's book is no accident.  It is but another Deep State Deep Fake calculated to deceive even the Elect.

Be Not Deceived.  God is not Mocked, and the Conciliar Cuckoos are going to have a very bad end.